================
@@ -1296,10 +1296,11 @@ enum CompletionType {
eRemoteDiskFileCompletion = (1u << 22),
eRemoteDiskDirectoryCompletion = (1u << 23),
eTypeCategoryNameCompletion = (1u << 24),
+ eThreadIDCompletion = (1u << 25),
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
Independent of the API standpoint, Greg is right. This is ABI-breaking,
something we try hard to avoid in LLDB. Even though programs linked against
older versions of LLDB will still be able to run against newer versions of
LLDB, the semantics of these values have changed and the program may do the
wrong thing. Even though I don't think it's likely that this will affect many
folks, you can never be too sure.
https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/sbapi.html
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73596
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
