mdko wrote: @jimingham So it seems that when `-t <tid>` is supplied, the user shouldn't be able to specify a thread index as well, e.g. the following is disallowed: ``` thread select -t 216051 1 ```
Would it make sense then for `thread select` to take two possible mutually exclusive options (`-t <tid>`) and (`-i <index>`), with the `-i` option being the default (i.e. doesn't need to be specified)? e.g. ``` thread select -t 216051 ``` and ``` thread select -i 1 thread select 1 ``` (where the `-i` doesn't need to be supplied by default)? > It makes the completer much easier to hook up since the option value can > complete against the native thread ID's Sounds good, I'll work on adding the complete for the native thread ID option with the above change. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73596 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
