Michael137 wrote: > I'm unclear on the specifics of the check, but it's probably something we can > adjust if that is the long-term solution. > > CC @petrhosek Since he was interested in getting this resolved soon.
There's a few things left to iron out with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72730, which I hope to resolve by Friday. If this is blocking you urgently then we could add back the constant to the declaration until I land https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72730 (instead of reverting the entire patch). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71780 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
