bulbazord wrote: > I addressed most of the feedback. Alex let me know if you still really want > llvm::Error and llvm::Expected to be used as I can add that if you think it > is required. I also ran clang format.
I think your answers make sense to me. I don't think you need to add them here since it all eventually turns into Status objects anyway... I generally prefer it over Status though. Thanks for checking. 👍 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71772 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
