dwblaikie wrote: > That's true, if defined in a header, we'll emit a DW_TAG_variable for the > constant in each compile unit the header is included in. GCC does do the > right thing and only emit the definition DIE in a single CU. We should > probably do the same. Though not sure at which level we want to catch that.
Which variable are you discussing here, `val1` or `val2`? For `val1`, we could not emit the constant value and only emit the real definition (there's /some/ risk here - non-ODR uses (or otherwise optimized away uses) of the variable may mean that the object file that defines the variable won't be linked in - so we'd miss the constant value) For `val2` the variable is effectively `inline` and doesn't have a home, so there's no one place that we can emit the `DW_TAG_variable` out-of-line definition... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70639 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
