mib marked 2 inline comments as done.
mib added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/bindings/python/python-typemaps.swig:108
+        } else {
+          $1 = $input;
+        }
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
> Do we actually have to do any conversions here? Like to turn it into an 
> SBStructuredData from a python list or dictionary?
No, if the input is a `lldb.SBStructuredData` python object, SWIG takes care of 
doing the conversion to the C++ type (line 87), but here we just made sure that 
the input is not an SB type and leave the type conversion to be done in lldb by 
the Script Interpreter code.


================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/API/SBStructuredData.h:34-36
+  static SBStructuredData
+  CreateFromScriptObject(const ScriptedTypedObject obj,
+                         const lldb::SBDebugger &debugger);
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
> Why do we offer both this and 
> `SBDebugger::CreateStructuredDataFromScriptObject`? They do the exact same 
> thing, when would you want to use one over the other?
This actually calls the `SBDebugger` method, but I tried to put myself in the 
user's shoes and I think I'd go look at the `SBStructuredData` help if I wanted 
to create a one from a script object. This one is for better discoverability 
and the other one (`SBDebugger`) is for better ergonomics (since we don't have 
to pass a debugger).


================
Comment at: lldb/source/API/SBStructuredData.cpp:51-53
+                                         const lldb::SBDebugger &debugger) {
+  return debugger.CreateStructuredDataFromScriptObject(obj);
+}
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
> I already asked why this is necessary, but if it does stick around you'll 
> want to add `LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA` here too yeah?
This is a `static` method and I don't think we call `LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA` in 
that case. Might be wrong though @JDevlieghere ?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D155161/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D155161

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to