bulbazord added a comment. Ok, this looks like it's doing the same thing to me which is good. My understanding of this change is that you're changing `lldb::DWARFDebugRanges::Extract` to use `llvm::DWARFDebugRangeList` instead of `lldb::DWARFRangeList`.
Out of curiosity, do you have an idea of the change to performance (if any)? I wouldn't expect it to be very different if at all because I don't think the algorithms between lldb and llvm are different but it would be nice to make sure. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150366/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150366 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
