rriddle added a comment. Could we switch the RTTI to use the llvm RTTI extension mechanism, instead of enums? Other classes have started doing this, and it'd be really nice if users can write REPLS without needing to touch upstream LLDB.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150303/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150303 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
