jingham added a comment. Apparently a similar change was made with dw_tag_t, in the line below your first deletion I see:
typedef llvm::dwarf::Tag dw_tag_t; It seems weird to have dw_tag_t but lvm::dwarf::Form. If there's a good reason to use the more verbose form, we should probably do the same with the Tag for consistency. Otherwise, you can just play the same re-typedef-ing as was done for tag, right? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150228/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150228 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
