jingham added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/unittests/API/SBCommandInterpreterTest.cpp:24
SBDebugger::Initialize();
m_dbg = SBDebugger::Create(/*source_init_files=*/false);
}
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
> jingham wrote:
> > It isn't clear to me how the changes in this file fit in with your overall
> > goal?
> I'm removing the `SBCommandInterpreter` member of this class because in order
> to construct an object of this class, `SBCommandInterpreter` would need to
> have an empty default constructor (which we do not have currently). I didn't
> want to add a constructor for SBCommandInterpreter just to avoid changing the
> test.
Sounds reasonable.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150157/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150157
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
