clayborg added a comment.

In D142926#4115875 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926#4115875>, @JDevlieghere 
wrote:

> In D142926#4114215 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926#4114215>, @bulbazord 
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure how useful it would be but I recorded the full list of methods get 
>> added with this change. Take a look and let me know if there are any that 
>> you think shouldn't be added.
>
> Thanks for generating that list. Given that the reproducers are not 
> functional, let's not add these to the Python API:
>
>   SBReproducer::Capture();
>   SBReproducer::Replay(const char *);
>   SBReproducer::Replay(const char *, bool);
>   SBReproducer::Finalize(const char *);
>   SBReproducer::GetPath();
>   SBReproducer::Generate();

Are they not functional from native code? or just not functional from Python?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to