jasonmolenda added a comment. In D143232#4101396 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143232#4101396>, @bulbazord wrote:
> LGTM. I wonder if there's a good way to exercise this with a test? Like maybe > we can create some bogus unwind information and see if LLDB falls over when > consuming it? I'm not sure how we could do that tbh - the currently executing frame uses an unwind plan sourced from the assembly instructions, and I can't construct assembly language that lldb would parse as using an invalid register number to calculate the canonical frame address. (I genuinely have no idea how we're hitting this codepath; it should not be possible.) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143232/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143232 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
