bulbazord added a comment. This is an interesting idea.
I suppose I find it a little strange that something from the SB API is passing a void * back to the caller instead of something more well defined (like another SB class or some primitive) but I suppose that's not the worst thing in the world. I'm not sure how else you would get a C++ method to return a type that is dependent on which language the method was called from... ================ Comment at: lldb/bindings/interface/SBProcess.i:347-348 + void* + GetImplementation(); + ---------------- Maybe a docstring is in order? Something to explain how to use this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143236/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143236 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits