DavidSpickett added a comment. > With -f(un)signed-char, the die corresponding to "char" may be the wrong > DW_ATE_(un)signed_char.
As the producer of the DWARF (so, clang for example) is this correct by the existing rules? As I understand it so far, if the compiler is using "char" (no sign chosen) it can use either `DW_ATE_unsigned_char` or `DW_ATE_signed_char`. So lldb cannot trust the choice the compiler made to tell it what plain `char` signedness should be? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136011/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136011 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
