alvinhochun added a comment. In D134518#3811218 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134518#3811218>, @labath wrote:
> Ok, so is there any harm in keeping them this way? > > The symbols may not be very useful, but I would not say that they are > useless. If, for whatever reason, the user finds himself inspecting the part > of the memory covered by the forwarder string, then with this symbol, that > memory would symbolicate as `forwarded_symbol+X`, which seems nice. I guess you're right, we can keep these symbols. Though do you think it make sense to synthesize a demangled name for the symbol, let's say `ExportName (forwarded to kernel32.LoadLibrary)`? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134518/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134518 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
