zequanwu added a comment.

In D133446#3788956 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3788956>, @labath wrote:

> In D133446#3787362 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3787362>, @zequanwu 
> wrote:
>
>> In D133446#3786561 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3786561>, @labath wrote:
>>
>>> In D133446#3780961 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3780961>, @zequanwu 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In D133446#3779600 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3779600>, @labath 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I believe that this fixes the crash, but the names of generated functions 
>>>>> still look fairly weird. Could we create them using their mangled name 
>>>>> instead? That way, someone might actually call them, if he was so 
>>>>> inclined.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like they don't have mangled name stored in pdb.
>>>
>>> Hmm.. That's unfortunate. In that case, I'm wondering if this shouldn't be 
>>> handled somehow directly inside `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser`. What does the 
>>> function return right now? Do you think that result is going to be useful 
>>> for other users of that class?
>>
>> `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser` expects a undercoated name of a entity(class, 
>> function, variable, etc) and returns the a pair of {pointer to parent decl 
>> context, base name of the entity}.
>
> Hmm... are you sure about that? `CreateDeclInfoForUndecoratedName` returns a 
> {decl ctx, base name} pair. `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser` returns (creates) an 
> array of `MSVCUndecoratedNameSpecifier`s. My question was about what those 
> specifiers are specifically for the inputs we're talking about here (`static 
> void B::dynamic atexit destructor for 'glob'()` or such), and whether those 
> outputs "make sense" for some user of that class (it's clear that they don't 
> make sense here).
>
> Basically, I'm trying to see whether it's possible (desirable?) to move this 
> logic into the parser class. The parser already does a lot of string 
> manipulation, so checking for these strings there would make more sense to me 
> than doing some sort of a pre-parse from the outside.

Sorry, I misunderstood you and copied the wrong function name there. And yeah, 
I think the logic should be moved into `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to