zequanwu added a comment. In D133446#3788956 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3788956>, @labath wrote:
> In D133446#3787362 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3787362>, @zequanwu > wrote: > >> In D133446#3786561 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3786561>, @labath wrote: >> >>> In D133446#3780961 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3780961>, @zequanwu >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In D133446#3779600 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446#3779600>, @labath >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I believe that this fixes the crash, but the names of generated functions >>>>> still look fairly weird. Could we create them using their mangled name >>>>> instead? That way, someone might actually call them, if he was so >>>>> inclined. >>>> >>>> It looks like they don't have mangled name stored in pdb. >>> >>> Hmm.. That's unfortunate. In that case, I'm wondering if this shouldn't be >>> handled somehow directly inside `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser`. What does the >>> function return right now? Do you think that result is going to be useful >>> for other users of that class? >> >> `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser` expects a undercoated name of a entity(class, >> function, variable, etc) and returns the a pair of {pointer to parent decl >> context, base name of the entity}. > > Hmm... are you sure about that? `CreateDeclInfoForUndecoratedName` returns a > {decl ctx, base name} pair. `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser` returns (creates) an > array of `MSVCUndecoratedNameSpecifier`s. My question was about what those > specifiers are specifically for the inputs we're talking about here (`static > void B::dynamic atexit destructor for 'glob'()` or such), and whether those > outputs "make sense" for some user of that class (it's clear that they don't > make sense here). > > Basically, I'm trying to see whether it's possible (desirable?) to move this > logic into the parser class. The parser already does a lot of string > manipulation, so checking for these strings there would make more sense to me > than doing some sort of a pre-parse from the outside. Sorry, I misunderstood you and copied the wrong function name there. And yeah, I think the logic should be moved into `MSVCUndecoratedNameParser`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133446 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits