labath added a subscriber: jasonmolenda. labath added a comment. In D128541#3622433 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128541#3622433>, @alvinhochun wrote:
> In D128541#3621364 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128541#3621364>, @labath wrote: > >> Well.. most OSes don't have this kind of functionality, so we don't really >> have an exact match for this. I suppose the closest thing would be the way >> we handle darwin OS logs, so you could try to see if reusing some of that >> infrastructure makes sense (StructuredDataDarwinLog.cpp and surrounding >> code). > > Thanks, `StructuredData` looks interesting and it seems like a nice way to do > this (albeit looking to be slightly overcomplicated). But I did a bit of > digging and found D106324 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106324>, and I get the > impression that it was planned to be removed eventually. Is it still a good > idea to reference that? Hmm... good question. I don't know. Maybe @jasonmolenda can say something about that. I, for one, would be definitely happy to see that entire subsystem go up in smoke, but if there is a use for it, I suppose we can keep it. The fact that there is no current user of it means that you may be able to redesign/replace the system with something more suitable to your use case. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128541/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128541 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
