hawkinsw added a comment.

In D126109#3535931 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126109#3535931>, @JDevlieghere 
wrote:

> In D126109#3534522 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126109#3534522>, @hawkinsw 
> wrote:
>
>> @DavidSpickett Thanks (again) for the feedback. Once I fix the nit, is the 
>> proper protocol for you to review again? I am sorry to ask but I don't know 
>> the right procedure and don't want to do the wrong thing!
>
> If the patch is accepted with a comment you can land the patch with the 
> comment addressed. Unless you disagree in which case you can continue 
> discussing in the code review.

Thanks @JDevlieghere ! I have updated the patch according to his feedback and I 
am running a full test on my desktop. I think that this is ready to land but I 
still haven't gotten myself in order and requested committer access so I will 
need your help again.

Thanks again for your patience and help getting me acclimated! Contributing is 
lots of fun!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D126109/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126109

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to