JDevlieghere accepted this revision.
JDevlieghere added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGMT
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/scripted/ScriptedProcess.cpp:321-342
+ auto sort_keys = [&sorted_threads,
+ &thread_info_sp](StructuredData::Object *item) -> bool {
+ if (!item)
+ return false;
+
+ llvm::StringRef key = item->GetStringValue();
+ size_t idx = 0;
----------------
mib wrote:
> mib wrote:
> > JDevlieghere wrote:
> > > Instead of this callback, can we simplify the code by iterating over the
> > > keys and populate the map that way?
> > We don't have iterators to iterate over `StructuredData` containers with a
> > range-based loop, so we can only iterate over them using indices ...
> >
> > I find it ungracious to do it that way because we have to call
> > `GetItemAtIndex(idx)` to get the `StructuredData::Object` element from the
> > array, that's why I used the `ForEach` method instead.
> >
> > I think we can improve StructuredData containers to be more customizable
> > and operate better with the `std`/`adl` utilities, it should be done
> > separately.
> I think we've discussed this offline, but if we made the
> `StructuredData::Array` templated (with a default template parameter), we
> could prevent having to sort ourself the thread dictionary, and loop twice
> over it (which annoys me quite a bit 😅😅)
Okay, that's unfortunate. Thanks for the explanation!
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122429/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122429
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
