mib marked an inline comment as done.
mib added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbutil.py:1624
+# ==================================================
+# Utility class to setup a progress event listener
+# ==================================================
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> We should make this more generic so that the warning and error events can 
> also use this. The way I imagined this was that the thread would be generic 
> and you would pass it in the broadcaster, the listener and the event type and 
> finally a function callback to have the test do whatever it wants with the 
> event. 
@JDevlieghere I think this could be achieved very easily by assuming the 
`_fetch_events` method will always be called and replace the `callback` 
argument by a "pointer" to the event_data_extractor function. wdyk ?'

Do you think it's a fair assumption (that we should always call `_fetch_events` 
and match the event against the `src_broadcaster` argument) ?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D121977/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D121977

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to