philnik added a comment. In D121078#3373081 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121078#3373081>, @SimplyDanny wrote:
> I'm happy that you found a reasonable compromise. I like it too. ;) > > Now, I ask you to help me a little bit with the workflow and the test > failures. The review comments are all taken care of as far as I see. One > reviewer approved the changes, others are still in a "needs changes" or an > undecided state. Are approvals of all reviewers required? I guess, the test > failures have nothing to do with my changes, or have they? Can we just ignore > them if they are unrelated? Please wait for libunwind and libc++ approval. I won't approve, because I'm not familiar with the documentation stuff. If the test failures are unrelated you can ignore them. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121078/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121078 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
