labath added a comment. In D120892#3357780 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120892#3357780>, @JDevlieghere wrote:
> Might a `llvm::once_flag` + `llvm::call_once` be simpler? Simpler... maybe.. depends how you look at it. But, synchronization-wise, it is overkill. once_flag ensures that none of the racing threads can make progress until the action terminates. Most of the time, that's exactly what we want, but here the correct operation of the other threads is not affected by this action, so it is sufficient that the warning gets printed "eventually". Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120892/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120892 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
