werat marked 2 inline comments as done.
werat added a comment.
In D113498#3137196 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498#3137196>, @teemperor wrote:
> Not sure how flexible your fuzzer setup is regarding downstream patches, but
> did you try putting some kind of `assert("coverage" && false);` in that new
> code and try fuzzing until you reach it?
It's not that flexible, it runs against the prebuilt version of LLVM 12 at the
moment -- https://github.com/google/lldb-eval/releases/tag/oss-fuzz-ubuntu-20.04
> FWIW, I'm OOO for an undefined amount of time so I am not sure when I can
> take a look at this again. Feel free to ping in case you don't find another
> reviewer.
Sure, I'll try to find someone else for now. Will ping if nobody comes along :)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
