mib added a comment. In D112046#3081556 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112046#3081556>, @mib wrote:
> In D112046#3081547 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112046#3081547>, @JDevlieghere > wrote: > >> Given that there's a 1:1 mapping between the target and the process, why did >> you change the interface as opposed to say extracting the process from the >> target? > > A process is guaranteed to have a target, but the inverse is not true: if the > process didn't launch or failed to launch, the target has no process. To add more to this, I can't think of any reason, at the moment, to create a ScriptedThread if you don't have ScriptedProcess. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112046/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112046 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
