JDevlieghere requested changes to this revision. JDevlieghere added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
I'd like to understand what the actual problem is and whether it can be avoided before we use a workaround like this. We have different places where we use structured data to communicate between Python and LLDB. What's special about this use case? If we really do need the workaround it would be good to keep that information somewhere so that the next person doesn't have to go through the same process. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112109/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112109 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
