jingham added a comment. The idea seems good, but I'm not sure how you are going to extend it? "Selector" seems a pretty ObjC specific term to me. Will this be what you use to get the "method name" part of the C++ names? That would look a bit odd to me, but OTOH having a GetSelector in all the subclasses, most of which don't have selectors also seems a little odd. This might be solved by just thinking of a better name, however. Also note, in the C++ case, it would be useful to distinguish between the method name, like Bar in Foo::Bar, and the fully qualified method name (like Bar(int, double) in Foo::Bar(int, double). That might effect the choice of names. The selector is the equivalent of a C++ fully qualified method name.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103210/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103210 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
