labath added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: JDevlieghere. In D100196#2713684 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196#2713684>, @mgorny wrote:
> Add an assert to make sure that process doesn't report fork/vfork stop reason > without multiprocess support. I guess this is the reason for that.. What I meant here was to do a sanity check on the client extensions -- like if a client claims to support "vfork-events" but not "multiprocess", then its probably broken (though it's a question what we should actually do about that). In the server our gdb-remote class always (I hope) supports multiprocess, so there's no danger of inconsistency. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
