jankratochvil planned changes to this revision. jankratochvil added a comment.
In D101237#2718456 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101237#2718456>, @shafik wrote: > AFAICT this will change the answer to basic questions such as what size a > `struct` is and this will likely lead to confusion from our users who will > expect the answers in expression parsing to match what they are seeing > elsewhere e.g.: OK, that justifies the new DW_AT_*. I did not notice there is this difference. For my needs the new DW_AT_* thus needs to be implemented also in GCC. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101237/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101237 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
