mgorny added a comment.

In D100191#2704681 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191#2704681>, @labath wrote:

> In D100191#2704492 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191#2704492>, @mgorny wrote:
>
>> In D100191#2704403 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191#2704403>, @labath wrote:
>>
>>> Let's identify the set of patches needed to make this testable via the 
>>> lldb-server suite (this one, D100153 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100153>, 
>>> D100208 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100208> (or equivalent for some other 
>>> os), and what else?) and test that?
>>
>> In its current form, D100208 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100208> relies at 
>> least on D100196 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196> as well. I suppose we 
>> might get away without other patches for now. My logic is that as long as 
>> client doesn't indicate fork support, the regular LLDB behavior won't 
>> change. We can mock-enable `fork-events` in the server tests to get things 
>> rolling, unless I'm missing something.
>
> Sounds great.
>
>> I think we could avoid merging D100196 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196> if 
>> I split D100208 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100208> into two parts, the 
>> earlier part just calling `NewSubprocess()` without actually reporting stop. 
>> This won't be really functional (or used in real sessions) but should 
>> suffice for testing.
>
> I'm not sure how would that work -- you'd still have to provide a way to 
> notify the client (test) about the new process and its pid, so that the test 
> can assert something meaningful. Let's just keep D100196 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196>, but leave out the client specific parts 
> -- just keep it about adding the new enums and relevant server code (trivial 
> case switches are fine).

Do you mean the `DidFoo()` methods, or the whole `StopInfo` stuff along with 
the logic in `ProcessGDBRemote`? If the latter, should I add some asserts for 
the unhandled stop reasons or just ignore them for now?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to