mgorny added a comment. In D98482#2623005 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98482#2623005>, @labath wrote:
> - I wouldn't add `multiprocess` to the qSupported packets just yet. Since > this is accepting the extended syntax regardless of whether the other side > claimed to support it (there's no hard in doing that, right?), we could flip > the switch after all packets have been ported. Sure, I have this split into more commits locally, I'll keep `qSupported' last. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98482/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98482 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
