labath added a comment. I'm not sure what are the "planned changes", but have you compared this implementation with the one in llvm. IIRC, I tried to implement it the same one as the one over there, but it seems the llvm one has changed since then. At a cursory glance it looks like it does not suffer from this problem, so it would be preferable if we could fix this problem, by making our implementation be more like the llvm one.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
