paolosev added a comment. In D78978#2481358 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78978#2481358>, @vwzm228 wrote:
> Is there any progress about such patch and D78801 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801>？ > > I have implemented the debugging feature in our Wasm VM based on > https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801, and it already work to attach, set > breakpoint, step, show variable value, backtrace... > > I am not sure if I need to change LLDB part to this one, or keep using D78801 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801>. > > But if both patches wont be merged, I have to maintain a private LLDB > version.... Unfortunately I have not received any more feedback for this patch, or the alternative version D78801 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801>, so I assumed it won't move forward :( Meanwhile, I have created a personal fork (https://github.com/paolosevMSFT/llvm-project/tree/WasmDbg). I still think that it would be very useful to add support for Wasm debugging to LLDB. Especially in scenarios where Wasm is not used as part of a web app, but server side (node.js) or running on micro runtime for IoT devices. I know that there is the problem that LLDB does not support segmented address spaces, and so this patch requires a couple of tiny but smelly changes to core code. From the mailing list I seem to remember that somebody was working to add support for segmented addresses, but I don't know what is the current state of the initiative. I'd be happy to keep working on this, please let me know what I could do to progress toward an acceptable solution. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78978/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78978 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
