jingham added a comment. This all looks fine except I'm not sure you can have a single override context. The lldb command line is only a bit recursive, but you can have sequences like:
(lldb) command source file_that_contains_a_step >>> Step hits a breakpoint which has commands One of those commands is a Python command that calls SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommandsFromFile - passing in some other SBExecutionContext IIUC, running the breakpoint command will push one override before running the command. Then HandleCommandsFromFile will push another, and you'll won't get back to the first one. And one of the weaknesses of lldb right now is that commands can't nest as well as they should. For instance, you really should be able to hit a breakpoint, and have the breakpoint command able to do a couple of next's of whatever, even though the weakness of the lldb command interpreter precludes that at present. So both for somewhat esoteric reasons like that above, and to future proof this change, I think you have to use a stack for the overrides/restore, not a single element. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92164/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92164 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
