labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
> Is return {...}; implicit ctor OK for LLDB? I have found only one line
> (return {sdk};) in rG5935227e11f5
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5935227e11f5b8e7111ee4a076c10a62d0648689> using
> that syntax and I would normally use it everywhere.
We don't have a policy on that. I personally wouldn't recommend using it
literally _everywhere_ (this can get messy in very long function and
particularly if you start nesting the `{}`s), but here it's perfectly fine.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89875/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89875
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
