jingham added a comment. In D87868#2286313 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87868#2286313>, @kastiglione wrote:
> Should lldb avoid calling asan (or any other sanitizer's) `mmap`? If so, > maybe this function can be sanitizer aware and ignore those symbols. At present, this is a function that gets used for any Posix, and I don't think it can know about sanitizers. If you want to do something of this sort, then the Platform should be asked for the library containing the canonical mmap, and we can load it from there. That would have the nice effect that we wouldn't search the whole symbol world for mmap, and allow the Platform to pick the right one. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87868/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87868 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
