labath requested changes to this revision. labath added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
If I correctly understand what this is doing, then I don't think it's a good idea. The base of an (elf) shared library does not have to be mapped executable. These are the mappings I get for a trivial hello world program (no mmapping of libraries or anything) on my linux machine: 00400000-00401000 r--p 00000000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 00401000-00402000 r-xp 00001000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 00402000-00403000 r--p 00002000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 00403000-00404000 r--p 00002000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 00404000-00405000 rw-p 00003000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 020fb000-0211c000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] 7fe4f5d87000-7fe4f5da9000 r--p 00000000 fd:01 2738932 /lib64/libc-2.31.so 7fe4f5da9000-7fe4f5ef3000 r-xp 00022000 fd:01 2738932 /lib64/libc-2.31.so 7fe4f5ef3000-7fe4f5f3d000 r--p 0016c000 fd:01 2738932 /lib64/libc-2.31.so 7fe4f5f3d000-7fe4f5f41000 r--p 001b5000 fd:01 2738932 /lib64/libc-2.31.so 7fe4f5f41000-7fe4f5f43000 rw-p 001b9000 fd:01 2738932 /lib64/libc-2.31.so ... Here, the correct base of a.out is 0x00400000 and the libc base is 0x7fe4f5d87000. But this patch would make them be detected as 0x00401000 and 0x7fe4f5da9000, respectively. This behavior is controlled by the `-z (no)separate-code`. My machine has `separate-code` as default, but that setting may not be universal, so you may need to pass this flag explicitly to reproduce this. For reference, these are the mappings I get when compiling a.out with `-z noseparate-code` (libc mappings remain unchanged, of course): 00400000-00401000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 00401000-00402000 r--p 00000000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out 00402000-00403000 rw-p 00001000 fd:01 2838574 /tmp/l/a.out It sounds like we need a better heuristic. How about "the number of consecutive mappings with the same name"? User mmapping code is likely going to map the library in a single chunk, but the dynamic linker will typically create multiple mappings (even a trivial executable can have five), so it seems like picking the longest sequence could work... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86375/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86375 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
