davide added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/valueobj-pass-by-reg/Makefile:2 +EXE := a.out +CFLAGS := -O1 + ---------------- davide wrote: > This is fundamentally a no-go. Depending on the optimization pipeline passes > this in a register is an assumption that might go away at some point in the > future and this test won't test what it has to & will still pass silently. > > Something like this might work: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Local-Register-Variables.html *depending on the optimization pipeline, the fact that is passed in a register is an assumption that CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85376/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85376 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
