llunak added a comment. In D68908#2174222 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68908#2174222>, @clayborg wrote:
> If removing 'd' was only to make it available for "up" and "down" in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D68541, then maybe we should switch 'D' to "detach > and let run? Or is that what we did, but the comment on line 4331 is now out > of date? Making 'd' available for "down" was the original motivation, but not having single-key shortcuts with "dangerous" seemed like a good thing on its own (or maybe I thought I needed strong arguments for reassigning 'd', I don't quite remember). I don't have a strong opinion on 'D'. On the one hand shift+d is harder to hit by accident. On the other hand that's still somewhat possible, the action is still available as 'F3 <https://reviews.llvm.org/F3>,d' in the menu, and gdb tui does not seem to have a single "dangerous" shortcut (according to https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/TUI-Single-Key-Mode.html). And I've never used the detach action, so I'd prefer if somebody else decided this. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68908/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68908 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
