amccarth accepted this revision. amccarth added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks @mstorsjo for clarifying for me. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/PECOFF/ObjectFilePECOFF.cpp:642 DataExtractor symtab_data = ReadImageData(m_coff_header.symoff, symbol_data_size + 4); lldb::offset_t offset = symbol_data_size; ---------------- mstorsjo wrote: > amccarth wrote: > > The `+4` at the end of this expression is from the same patch. I wonder if > > it was an attempt to make space for the four bytes of zeros at offset 0 > > that you're eliminating? > > > > I suggest removing the `+4` and trying the tests again unless it's obvious > > to you why it's still necessary. The comment above seems like it might be > > trying to explain it, but that comment came later. > No, the `+4` here was present before 0076e71592a6a (if viewing that commit, > view it with a bit more than the default git context size and you'll find "// > Include the 4 bytes string table size at the end of the symbols" existing > already before that. > > The +4 here can't be eliminated; without it, the `const uint32_t strtab_size > = symtab_data.GetU32(&offset)` two lines below would be out of range. So this > first reads the symbol table and the 4 byte size of the string table, and if > the string table turns out to be nonzero in size, it also loads a separate > DataExtractor with the string table contents, with the two DataExtractors > overlapping for that size field. It doesn't have anything to do with > overwriting the start, just with the code layout in general. Sorry, I mixed up `strtab_data` and `symtab_data` when comparing to the old patch, which is why I didn't see the comment where I expected it. The old patch actually _removed_ a `+4` when computing the offset for `strtab_data`. It seemed weird this patch didn't have to restore that in order to back out this part of the change. But I think I understand it now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83881/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83881 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits