jankratochvil added a comment. In D77327#1971435 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77327#1971435>, @labath wrote:
> The `bool` return value on all of these methods, is that here just to > implement the `fallback` mechanism in DebugNamesDWARFIndex? Most of them yes. There are still some functions needing to return `bool` to benefit from the early returns from callbacks. I hope I found the minimal set of such `bool` functions (none of those are in `DWARFIndex`). > Could it be avoided if debug_names index calls the "fallback" *after* it has > done its own processing? Yes. Done so now. I still do not understand what is `DebugNamesDWARFIndex` good for when it always calls `ManualDWARFIndex` anyway. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77327/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77327 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
