jarin added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:63
if (pos != m_L1_cache.begin()) {
- --pos;
+ pos--;
}
----------------
labath wrote:
> I guess this is a leftover from splitting the patches?
>
> Speaking of post-increment the [[
> http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#prefer-preincrement | llvm rule ]]
> is to use pre-increment whereever possible. I see the test uses
> post-increment exclusively for no good reason.
But, but,... I only increment/decrement in statement position!
Just kidding, I am sorry, fixed now...
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77790/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77790
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
