labath added a comment. In D75750#1967019 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75750#1967019>, @fche2 wrote:
> >> So it might be good to have the SymbolVendors use one or more SymbolServer > >> plug-ins. > > > > I don't believe we have anything that would require all modules in a given > > target (or whatever) to use the same symbol vendor type. [...] > > Just for clarity, is someone proposing to undertake such a rework of that > infrastructure? It sounds like this is becoming a prerequisite for Konrad's > patch, but if no one's actually doing it, that means Konrad's work is on hold > indefinitely. Is that the intent? Yes, I believe that is becoming a prerequisite. I believe Konrad is willing to try to implement that, but I have advised him to hold on a bit until the exact details are hashed out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75750/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75750 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
