labath added a reviewer: jasonmolenda. labath added a comment. I am still thinking this over, but for now I have two comments. First, could you re-upload the diff with full context (e.g. `git show -U9999`). That would make it a lot easier to review this. Second, would it be possible to change the meaning of the `invalidate_regs` and `value_regs` lists so that they do the right thing even in your case (instead of introducing a new number)? We already have too many numbering schemes to begin with, and introducing a new one is definitely something I'd like to avoid (in particular when the number is stored as `eRegisterKindLLDB` on the server side, but then becomes `eRegisterKindProcessPlugin` on the other end).
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77043/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77043 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
