labath added a comment. The approach seems reasonable to me.
================ Comment at: lldb/unittests/Language/CPlusPlus/CPlusPlusLanguageTest.cpp:153-155 + // We expect these cases to fail until we turn on C++2a + // {"A::operator<=><A::B>", "A", "operator<=><A::B>"}, + // {"operator<=><A::B>", "", "operator<=><A::B>" }, ---------------- You could add these to the "EXPECT_FALSE" list below CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits