labath added a comment.

The approach seems reasonable to me.



================
Comment at: lldb/unittests/Language/CPlusPlus/CPlusPlusLanguageTest.cpp:153-155
+      // We expect these cases to fail until we turn on C++2a
+      //      {"A::operator<=><A::B>", "A", "operator<=><A::B>"},
+      //      {"operator<=><A::B>", "", "operator<=><A::B>" },
----------------
You could add these to the "EXPECT_FALSE" list below


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to