jarin marked an inline comment as done. jarin added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverRange.cpp:176 + // rely on that breakpoint to trigger once we return to the range. + if (m_next_branch_bp_sp) + return false; ---------------- We could do some more sanity checking here. For example, we could ensure that the return address is still before the next branch breakpoint, or, ideally, record the beginning of the next-branch range and check the return address is in that range. However, I am not quite sure what this would protect us against (mucking with the stack, perhaps?) and what to do if the check fail - falling back to the old behavior does not really seem to solve anything because that introduces even more noise by pushing all the step-out plans. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76216/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76216 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
