labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks good. The mapping vs sequence traits thingy is not that important, but
since we do have the "dump" command, it may be worthwhile to spent a bit of
time implementing a slightly more complicated traits class so that the yaml
output looks nicer. (Another reason against wrapping standard containters in
custom XXXList classes)
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Utility/ProcessInfo.cpp:348-351
+void llvm::yaml::MappingTraits<ProcessInstanceInfoList>::mapping(
+ IO &io, ProcessInstanceInfoList &List) {
+ io.mapRequired("processes", List.m_infos);
+}
----------------
Maybe define this as a `SequenceTraits<ProcessInstanceInfoList>`? I believe you
could implement the required functions by simply forwarding them to
`SequenceTraits<std::vector<ProcessInstanceInfo>>::whatever`
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76004/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76004
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
