JDevlieghere added a comment. In D75810#1912248 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75810#1912248>, @labath wrote:
> Yeah, naming conventions in lldb have always been a controversial topic. Most > of the code uses the lldb convention, but some of the new code (particularly > if it interfaces with llvm a lot) uses more llvm-like conventions. I think we > used to have a description of the naming convention somewhere on the website. > That is no longer there, but neither do we have a plan for migration. > > I don't really know what that means for this patch... I would exclude `readability-identifier-naming` from the list of checks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75810/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75810 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
