labath added a comment. In D73067#1884970 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067#1884970>, @krytarowski wrote:
> Autogeneration of the code puts extra burden on us for tracking what is > defined where and for repackaging LLDB with custom build rules (we need plain > Makefile in the distribution). I presume the same problem is for gn users, > for FreeBSD etc. LLVM has a policy to not consider downstream issues when making changes, so you won't achieve much from that angle (you can check out the current camel case thread on llvm-dev to see how deeply some feel about this policy). And even though we ourselves had to do some build system gymnastics to merge this change, I do think this change does make sense for llvm/lldb. However, ignoring all downstream considerations, I am still not a fan of code generation, and if you have a idea how to achieve something similar without it, I would be very happy to hear it out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
