JDevlieghere added a comment. In D73766#1851224 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766#1851224>, @teemperor wrote:
> FWIW I'm currently going over the failing tests and fixing them, so unless I > find a test that actually needs unordered subsets I don't think having the > parameter makes sense. Yep, that was my reasoning as well, if everything can be converted without falling back to the old behavior there's no need to keep the parameter. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
