JDevlieghere added a comment. In D71306#1778484 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71306#1778484>, @mgorny wrote:
> I'm going to be blunt but if you dislike what LLVM does, improve that rather > than proliferating inconsistencies between subprojects. I think LLVM's behavior makes sense for LLVM but makes less sense for LLDB. I'm all for consistency, but that doesn't mean we should shoehorn anything just because that's how it's done in LLVM. > That said, there are few things that could improve this. We could print a > nice summary of which dependencies were found and which were not at the end > of CMake run. We could move variables for controlling deps (or maybe even all > user-set variables) to a separate file (meson does something like this, i > think), so they're easier to find and track. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71306/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71306 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
